Trans criminals could be put in single-sex units based on their ‘acquired gender’


Young offenders who identify as transgender could be put in single-sex units based on their ‘acquired gender‘ as part of a plan being considered by the government. 

Campaigners have said parts of the Youth Custody Service’s draft Transgender Guidance documents are ‘troubling’ and ‘risky’ due to concern over male-born 10 to 18-year-olds being housed with girls. 

The draft paper, set to be published and finalised this autumn, says that staff in the first instance would seek to place a trans child in a secure children’s home or training centre rather than a young offenders’ institution, which usually only house boys. 

This is due to children’s homes and training centres accommodating both genders, meaning the child would interact with both boys and girls. 

If they are put in a mixed institution with single-sex units for boys and girls, the trans child could be housed ‘in the unit of the acquired gender’ – based on a risk assessment, The Times reported. 

This comes amid the government’s equality watchdog ruling that trans people can be legally banned from single-sex spaces and the NHS’ only children’s Gender Identity Clinic being forced to close. 

Young offenders who identify as transgender could be put in single-sex units based on their ‘acquired gender’ as part of a plan considered by the government (stock image)

Heather Binning, of the Women’s Rights Network, told the Times: ‘The wider implications of this are troubling. 

‘Policies for girls are being changed with no regard for the material reality of their sex and their need for safety, privacy and dignity when they are going through puberty.’

In a statement Women’s Place UK told the MailOnline: ‘Any policy that allows for mixed-sex accommodation is more evidence that child welfare is not at the centre of the youth detention model. 

‘The law allows for single-sex provision, especially where girls sleep and dress. Ofsted’s 2021 report showed that the sexual harassment and assault of girls in schools is widespread, so allowing boys to share accommodation with girls in youth detention centres puts a group of highly vulnerable girls at significant risk of sexual violence and harassment.’

Specialists from the Youth Custody Service, part of Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service, and NHS came up with the guidance to comply with a national justice system policy, in force since 2019, which covers how to look after trans people in the prison system. 

It requires that trans children be matched with the part of the justice system that matches their legally recognised gender but this can be changed by officials at the Youth Custody Service and the new guidance explains how this could happen. 

Campaigners have described elements of the Youth Custody Service's draft Transgender Guidance documents as 'troubling' due to concern over male-born 10 to 18-year-olds being housed with girls. Pictured: A 12-year-old transgender swimmer waits by a pool

Campaigners have described elements of the Youth Custody Service’s draft Transgender Guidance documents as ‘troubling’ due to concern over male-born 10 to 18-year-olds being housed with girls. Pictured: A 12-year-old transgender swimmer waits by a pool

What the EHRC says on single-sex services 

The guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission states that ‘if you are providing a service to one sex only (and not to the other), you must be able to meet one of the following conditions’:

  1. Only people of that sex need the service.
  2. Providing the service jointly to both sexes would not be sufficiently effective.
  3. The level of need for the services makes it not reasonably practicable to provide separate services for each sex.
  4. The service is provided at a hospital or other place, where users need special care, supervision or attention.
  5. The service is likely to be used by more than one person at the same time and a woman might reasonably object to the presence of a man (or vice versa).
  6. A person might reasonably object to the service user being of the opposite sex because the service involves physical contact.

You must also be able to show that providing the service on a single-sex basis is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Again, proportionality requires that you balance the impact on all service users of providing services only to one sex.

It says: ‘If CYP [children and young people] are placed in a mixed establishment with distinguished units for males and females, transgender CYP are to be placed [in the] unit of the acquired gender if […] the risk assessment supports this.’

And if it does, the trans child can be put in secure and smaller units in children’s homes or training centres where they can mix with both genders. 

It adds: ‘This will allow transgender CYP to feel more comfortable expressing their transgender identity in a mixed environment rather than in a secure setting where they are only mixing with one gender.’

A Youth Custody Service spokesperson said there are currently only 14 girls in the youth estate, 485 boys and no transgender young offenders and few options for female-only settings in the youth estate as the vast majority are male or mixed. 

They added: ‘These claims are misleading. Boys and girls are generally accommodated together in the youth estate and a transgender child would never be moved to a different unit simply based on their own wishes, safeguarding is always the priority in placement decisions.

‘There are currently no transgender children in the youth estate.’

It was also said that the ‘primary concern’ for placing a child was safeguarding and placements were built around a ‘child’s identified needs’. 

North London-based Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), part of the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, has treated 9,000 children as young as 10 since it opened in 1989.

But it has faced a myriad of accusations from staff and former patients, with patients claiming they were rushed to change gender without having their mental health properly assessed.

It was finally brought down last week after a probe into claims from brave whistleblowers who had been raising concerns about practices at the trust for 17 years. 

Meanwhile, in April the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said that service providers wishing to limit services to a single sex are legally able to do so, provided the reasons are justified and proportionate.

The new guidance will have huge ramifications for hospitals, retailers, hospitality and sports clubs which have faced difficult issues in recent years under pressure from the trans lobby.

It makes it clear that it is legal for a gym to limit communal changing rooms to a single sex, as long as a gender neutral changing room is also provided for trans people.



Source link