Apologies to Ranveer Singh. But it’s so, so good and reassuring to find outrage against good old-fashioned ‘obscenity’ again – as opposed to the flurry of charges and worse against ‘hurting religious sentiments’. With one single episode, it’s almost like we’re back in the 1990s again when Milind Soman and Madhu Sapre, with their Adam-Eve act in a prophylactic ad, made aunties and uncles paroxysmal with sanskriti outrage. Singh shed his OTT clothes for a magazine photo shoot. The photos showcased the actor’s superbly sculpted nude body tastefully. But before one could say ‘Michelangelo!’, two applications were filed with Mumbai Police on Monday seeking an FIR (the latest mode of outrage registration) against the actor for ‘hurting sentiments of women’.
Now, this is a departure from the old ‘women being depicted obscenely’ indignation. Being a man, Singh may have, theoretically, hurt the sentiments of some men. But how does his nude photos that he shared on social media get the she-goat of an office-bearer of an NGO in Chembur? Singh was neither flashing nor streaking – actions that are liable to flutter the cardiac muscles of some women the wrong way. But it’s such a welcome relief from the usual bouts of outrage that we have to thank both complainant and Singh for providing a much-needed digression from the usual canker.
Related posts:
Verstappen Tops Opening Abu Dhabi GP Practice, Lewis Hamilton Finishes Fifth
Zoom in regular touch with India Govt on data security, have local servers: India head
Audi to Supply Engines for Sauber in Formula One
The Joys of river rafting
Jio could do to the world's 5G market, what it did to India’s telecom market in 2016
nato: From Russia a shove, Finland joins NATO
Opinion | Europe’s Vaccine Rollout Has Descended Into Chaos
Opinion | The Red-Blue Divide Goes Well Beyond Biden and Trump
“Use of force would have caused a lot of collateral damage”: Delhi Police chief SN...
Opinion | J.D. Vance: The Math on Ukraine Doesn’t Add Up