Not being fond of Jawaharlal Nehru may not be a human right but it certainly is a choice. In fact, being not fond of anyone, including persons and personages that many people find ‘fondable’, is perfectly all right. So, if the first PM is excluded in anyone’s scrapbook of Indian freedom fighters, one shouldn’t get into a foamful tizzy. Keeping him out of an honours roll call is okay, as is being critical of his exclusion. Excluding Nehru from an Independence Day government ad – as was the case this August 15 with a Karnataka government ‘poster’ – is, at least, not launching a tirade against the man, and far from a demand to put him behind bars or variations thereof. The reason cited for Nehru not making the grade was that he was ‘responsible for Partition’. Again, that is fodder for a perfectly healthy debate that can be played out across the length and breadth of newspaper Oped pages.
As for freedom fighters’ lists, Groucho Marx was not one for India himself, but he did say, ‘I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.’ Closer home – if not in familiarity then in distance – the writer Shibram Chakraborty refused his freedom fighters’ stipend saying that he didn’t fight for Indian independence for the money. Nehru, too – one can only suppose – wouldn’t have minded being left out of the I-Day ‘party’ in Karnataka.
Related posts:
Lewis Hamilton Expects Another Tough Battle with Max Verstappen at Spanish GP
Opinion | The Ghost of Sabotage Future
Opinion | Israel’s Self-Inflicted Wound
Now, to sustain the surge in investments
Four women from Kerala who joined the ISIS wanted to return to India but the Centre has...
Opinion | Learning to Love My Father as His Mind Unraveled
Opinion | For Israelis and Palestinians, the Two-State ‘Solution’ Isn’t a Solution at All
Opinion | Can We Reach a Consensus on Gay Rights and Religion?
Opinion | How Joe Biden Can Unify the Country
Opinion | Biden Should Finish the Wall