Shamed reporter Martin Bashir has insisted his 1995 Panorama interview with Princess Diana ‘was as she wanted it’ – but admitted he was ‘wrong’ to forge bank statements.
The journalist’s reputation is in tatters following Lord Dyson’s report that he used ‘deceitful behaviour’ to land his world exclusive scoop.
But breaking his interview silence following the bombshell review, Bashir told The Sunday Times that Diana was never unhappy about the content of the interview and they continued to be friends after the broadcast.
He said he ‘never wanted to harm’ the princess , claiming: ‘I loved her.’
Addressing the princesses’ sons Princes William and Harry – both of whom issued statements blasting the deceit and the BBC’s cover up – Bashir said he is ‘deeply sorry’.
He said he ‘can’t imagine what their family must feel each day, although I know a little of that myself having lost a brother and father prematurely’.
But the journalist disputed the Duke of Cambridge’s charge that he fuelled Diana’s isolation and paranoia, saying: ‘Even in the early 1990s, there were stories and secretly recorded phone calls.
‘I wasn’t the source of any of that.’
While Bashir failed to apologise for what Lord Dyson dubbed ‘devious and dishonest’ behaviour, he did say he was sorry for showing forged bank statements he commissioned to Earl Spencer.
‘Obviously I regret it, it was wrong. But it had no bearing on anything. It had no bearing on [Diana], it had no bearing on the interview.’
It was these statements – some of which wrongly suggested Earl Spencer’s ex-head of security Alan Waller was in the pay of tabloid journalists – that got him in contact with Diana.
Graphic designer Matt Wiessler – who made the forgeries – blew the whistle on Bashir and was subsequently banned from the BBC.
The shamed reporter apologised for not approaching Mr Wiessler after he got the sack, saying: ‘I am sorry about that.’
He told the newspaper: ‘I never wanted to harm Diana in any way and I don’t believe we did.
‘Everything we did in terms of the interview was as she wanted, from when she wanted to alert the palace, to when it was broadcast, to its contents … My family and I loved her.’
Bashir said he and his family remained close to Diana after the interview.
He shared a picture of the princess visiting St George’s hospital in Tooting, south London, on the day Bashir’s wife Deborah gave birth to the couple’s third child, Eliza.
He told The Sunday Times: ‘We were friends. She was spectacular.
‘She said to me: “You must let me know the moment the baby arrives,” and an hour later, there was a knock on the delivery room and in she walked.’
Shamed reporter Martin Bashir (pictured) has insisted he ‘never wanted to harm’ Princess Diana with his bombshell 1995 Panorama interview
The journalist’s reputation is in tatters following Lord Dyson’s report that he used ‘deceitful behaviour’ to land his world exclusive scoop (the interview, pictured)
Bashir said he is ‘deeply sorry’ to Prince William and Prince Harry, but disputes the Duke of Cambridge’s charge that he fuelled her isolation and paranoia. Pictured: Diana with her sons
Lord Dyson was commissioned six months ago to examine whether Princess Diana would have given the historic 1995 interview had it not been for Mr Bashir’s underhand tactics
Diana’s brother Earl Spencer has said he ‘draws a line’ between the 1995 interview and his sister’s death in Paris in 1997, claiming Bashir’s actions led her to give up her royal security detail.
Showing a remarkable lack of remorse, he said: ‘I don’t feel I can be held responsible for many of the other things that were going on in her life, and the complex issues surrounding those decisions.’
He admitted that he understood Earl Spencer’s anger but rejected as ‘a little unreasonable’ his attempts to channel his sister’s death and the relationship between the Royal family and the media on to his shoulders.
‘The suggestion I am singularly responsible I think is unreasonable and unfair,’ he said.
Bashir commissioned documents purporting to show payments into the bank accounts of members of the royal household and showed them to Earl Spencer, according to Lord Dyson.
He said: ‘Obviously I regret it, it was wrong. But it had no bearing on anything. It had no bearing on [Diana], it had no bearing on the interview.’
He said he is now concerned the scandal will overshadow the content of what Diana said in the interview.
‘She was a pioneering princess. When you think about her expressions of grief in her marriage, when you think about the admission of psychiatric illness – just extraordinary! And her sons have gone on to champion mental health,’ he said.
Diana’s brother Earl Spencer (pictured) has said he ‘draws a line’ between the interview and his sister’s death, claiming Bashir’s actions led her to give up her royal security detail
‘I don’t understand what the purpose of this is ultimately? OK, maybe you want to destroy me, but outside of this, what’s the point?
‘I did something wrong… but for pity’s sake, acknowledge something of the relationship we had and something of what she contributed through that interview.
‘One of the saddest things about all of this has been the way the content of what she said has almost been ignored.’
Bashir’s comments come after former BBC director-general Lord Tony Hall quit as chairman of the National Gallery after he was heavily criticised in the Dyson report for his botched inquiry into how the interview was obtained.
His resignation comes after another former BBC executive involved in the 1996 internal investigation, Tim Suter, announced on Friday that he was stepping down from his board role with media watchdog Ofcom.
Earl Spencer is reported to have written to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick asking her to investigate the BBC.
The Duke of Cambridge said Martin Bashir’s deceit in obtaining his 1995 interview with Princess Diana hastened his parents’ divorce and ‘hurt countless others’ in unprecedented broadside against the shamed BBC
Scotland Yard has already said that it will assess Lord Dyson’s findings to determine whether they contain any ‘significant new evidence’.
Lord Hall – who in 1996 was director of BBC news and current affairs – led the investigation which exonerated Bashir, even though he had previously admitted lying about the fake documents he used in obtaining the interview.
He was director-general when Bashir was controversially rehired by the BBC as religious affairs correspondent in 2016 and later promoted to religion editor.
Chairman of the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Julian Knight has called on current director-general Tim Davie to provide a full explanation as to how Bashir came to be re-employed.
Mr Knight said that some people may suspect that the journalist was given the religion job as a way of keeping quiet about what exactly he knew.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme the BBC should now consider paying compensation to ‘whistleblowers’ who had had their careers damaged after raising concerns about the way Bashir had operated.
Mr Knight said there was a need for further reform at the BBC, and he called for a strengthening of editorial policy within the corporation.
Mr Davie wrote to BBC staff on Friday saying: ‘I know that we now have significantly stronger processes and governance in place to ensure that an event like this doesn’t happen again. However we must also learn lessons and keep improving.’