States have surrendered the bulk of their freedom over taxation, but are confronted with individual development challenges that justify this freedom in the first place. The Centre, on its part, is committed to balanced development that assigns higher weights to development challenges common to all states. These approaches are occasionally in conflict. Centre-state resource transfers are bundled in a policy template designed in New Delhi that may not resonate in state capitals. This apart, states find it difficult to operate within fiscal parameters set out by the Centre, where everyone is in breach. Here, too, states face some loss of agency over expenditure.
Conflict resolution should ideally be directed at baking a bigger revenue pie, rather than deciding on how it should be sliced. States are progressively increasing their share of the divisible pool of government resources and will find it in their best interests to accept the consensus over taxation. Where scope exists to expand their influence over resources, states are free to do so, with the proviso that their development is not in isolation. Fortunately, areas of dispute have narrowed considerably with economic liberalisation. Where they persist, enlightened self-interest could offer more enduring solutions.