Apologies to Ranveer Singh. But it’s so, so good and reassuring to find outrage against good old-fashioned ‘obscenity’ again – as opposed to the flurry of charges and worse against ‘hurting religious sentiments’. With one single episode, it’s almost like we’re back in the 1990s again when Milind Soman and Madhu Sapre, with their Adam-Eve act in a prophylactic ad, made aunties and uncles paroxysmal with sanskriti outrage. Singh shed his OTT clothes for a magazine photo shoot. The photos showcased the actor’s superbly sculpted nude body tastefully. But before one could say ‘Michelangelo!’, two applications were filed with Mumbai Police on Monday seeking an FIR (the latest mode of outrage registration) against the actor for ‘hurting sentiments of women’.
Now, this is a departure from the old ‘women being depicted obscenely’ indignation. Being a man, Singh may have, theoretically, hurt the sentiments of some men. But how does his nude photos that he shared on social media get the she-goat of an office-bearer of an NGO in Chembur? Singh was neither flashing nor streaking – actions that are liable to flutter the cardiac muscles of some women the wrong way. But it’s such a welcome relief from the usual bouts of outrage that we have to thank both complainant and Singh for providing a much-needed digression from the usual canker.
Related posts:
Opinion | What Belarusians Can Learn From Poland
Opinion | Abolish the Racist, Sexist Subminimum Wage
Opinion | Amazon’s Cynical, Anti-Union Attack on Mail Voting
World had many Chinese companies to go after but it chose to target Huawei and the intent....
Census, much more than a sensibility
'Bit of Moaning From One of Our Rivals': Christian Horner Hits Back After Red Bull Cleared...
The Commuterist Manifesto: A white-collar right to travel to work daily
Making greatness priceless with price
Austrian Grand Prix: Max Verstappen Races to Sprint Victory as Dutchman's Domination...
Opinion | Trump’s Speech Didn’t Project Unity.