BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday allowed social media giant Twitter Inc to place the various ‘blocking orders’ issued by the Union government before it in sealed envelopes. Justice Krishna S Dixit, who is hearing the case, also directed the microblogging company that the same has to be shared with the advocate for the Union government.
The Centre’s advocate has requested the court that the proceedings of this case be held in-camera. This will mean a private hearing in which parties not part of the proceedings will not be allowed.
The court said the request will be considered.
Twitter Inc has approached the High Court against 10 different ‘blocking orders’, issued by the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
These orders are variously dated between February 2, 2021 and February 28, 2022. They include orders to block accounts, tweets, URLs and hashtags.
On Tuesday, the single judge bench was informed by Twitter’s counsel Mukul Rohatgi that MeitY has failed to record reasons for ordering the closure of accounts.
The procedures and safeguards of the IT Rules 2009 require the reasons to be recorded and since Twitter will be answerable to the account holders, “if this continues, my whole business will close”, Rohatgi submitted.
After issuing notice to the Centre in the petition, the hearing of the case was adjourned to August 12.
The Centre’s advocate has requested the court that the proceedings of this case be held in-camera. This will mean a private hearing in which parties not part of the proceedings will not be allowed.
The court said the request will be considered.
Twitter Inc has approached the High Court against 10 different ‘blocking orders’, issued by the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
These orders are variously dated between February 2, 2021 and February 28, 2022. They include orders to block accounts, tweets, URLs and hashtags.
On Tuesday, the single judge bench was informed by Twitter’s counsel Mukul Rohatgi that MeitY has failed to record reasons for ordering the closure of accounts.
The procedures and safeguards of the IT Rules 2009 require the reasons to be recorded and since Twitter will be answerable to the account holders, “if this continues, my whole business will close”, Rohatgi submitted.
After issuing notice to the Centre in the petition, the hearing of the case was adjourned to August 12.
Related posts:
Japan: People left dangling as rollercoaster stops mid-ride
Pythons On Your Porch? Call Myanmar's 'Snake Princess'
Kentucky Derby: Bob Baffert's winner Medina Spirit fails drugs test
Chop off my head ... but can't give more dearness allowance: Mamata Banerjee to protesters...
Abu Bakar Ba'asyir: Radical cleric linked to Bali bombings freed
Sri Lanka zeroes in on handler of four ISIS terrorists arrested in India
As many countries struggle with Covid-19, China just set its agenda for the...
UiPath stock spikes after earnings beat, generative AI integration
How interest rates impact your money — from savings to mortgages
YouTube will share revenue with Shorts creators as TikTok surges